• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Art of Composing

Let's learn to compose together.

  • Start Here
  • Courses
    • Fundamentals (101)
    • Sonata Form (201)
  • Podcast
  • Video
  • Articles
    • Form
    • Harmony
    • Melody
    • Orchestration
    • Process
  • About
    • Contact
    • Listen to My Music
  • Composing Resources
    • Recommended Books
    • Orchestration Resources
    • Forum
    • Archives
You are here: Home / Form / Small Ternary Form

Small Ternary Form

October 17, 2011 By Jon Brantingham 9 Comments

Small ternary form is a great way for you to create a three part piece. It follows a simple structure, A-B-A’, but built into it is a set of very useful techniques that you can use to add logic and interest to your themes.

In this article, you’ll learn about some great techniques for creating an interesting and contrasting B section, called the contrasting middle, and how you can add or remove material when you bring back your A prime section, called the recapitulation. If you haven’t covered the sentence and period yet, I would recommend starting with those articles.

Themes as Musical Archetypes

So let’s talk about the small ternary form and small binary form. These forms, along with the sentence and period, are really the basis for most classical themes. If you’re interested in learning how to compose using these forms, I have an in depth course that covers all of these theme types. Check out The Fundamentals of Musical Composition.

There are additional hybrid themes, which I explore in my course Composing Music in Sonata Form.

But let me be clear, I am not saying that most music fits these forms exactly. Music has a way of not fitting into the cookie-cutter examples. Instead we need to look at them as prototypes, or even better, archetypes. They are kind of like DNA. DNA can have millions of different combinations, and create infinite variety. But DNA only really contains four molecules, just rearranged over and over again.

Small Ternary

We start our conversation off with small ternary form. The small ternary form is, as you would guess from the name, basically a three part theme. It is commonly written as A-B-A’. It has three formal functions.

  1. Exposition (A)
  2. Contrasting Middle (B)
  3. Recapitulation (A’)

This mirrors another, another large form, the Sonata Form. But the Sonata Form is a little too big to cover today, so I’ll save it for another post.

Let’s listen to a complete small ternary form.

The Exposition

The exposition in small ternary form is normally made up of a sentence or period, as discussed in the previous posts. Normally in an exposition, these two theme types appear in their basic form, or a hybrid form (mixing elements from sentences and periods). When they are 8 bars, and contain all of their basic formal functions, they are known as tight-knit themes.

The Contrasting Middle

The contrasting middle section in small ternary form gets its contrast mostly by harmonic means. The goal for the contrasting middle section is almost always dominant harmony (V). The contrasting middle has a few different charcteristics from the expositions as well:

  1. Tends to be much looser in organization
  2. Creates instability (mostly harmonic instability)
  3. Frequently changes texture

Tight-Knit vs. Loose Organization

Let me talk a moment about tight-knit themes and loose themes. These are terms, once again from Classical Form, by William Caplin. I think they are excellent ways of thinking about how to use these forms for real composing.

Tight-Knit Form

Tight-knit usually refers to the basic theme types, the sentence and period. They are both 8 bars, and can be explained relatively easily. They also have a number of hybrids, mixing the parts of both periods and sentences together.

Hybrids

  1. Compound Basic Idea (an antecedent without a cadence) + Continuation
  2. Antecedent + Continuation
  3. Antecedent + Expanded Cadential (cadential takes up the entire continuation)
  4. Compound Basic Idea + Consequent

Loose Form

In comparison with tight-knit themes, loose themes use certain devices to add material and expand the 8 bar themes beyond their usual scope:

  1. Extension – Adding on extra material. This is usually accomplished through further fragmentation of ideas. It is also very common in cadences.
  2. Expansion – “Internally lengthening components” of a formal function from there typcial length in a tight-knit theme.
  3. Interpolation – Adding on extra material, that has no other formal function.

Recapitulation

The recapitulation is the final part of the small ternary form. This is commonly a tight-knit theme. It is called the recapitulation because it brings back the material from the exposition. Very frequently it gets rid of unnecessary material as well. What is unnecessary? Let’s look at a period for example.

The period has an antecedent phrase, consisting of a basic idea, and a contrasting Idea with a weak cadence.

It also has a consequent phrase, consisting of a repeat of the basic idea, and a new contrasting idea with a strong cadence.

Just looking at the words above, you can clearly see what is “unnecessary.” It is material that is functionally redundant.

  1. Basic idea
  2. Contrasting Idea with a weak cadence,
  3. Repeat of basic idea
  4. New contrasting idea with a strong cadence.

A period, with the functionally redundant material taken out, is essentially a consequent phrase.

This allows you to take a simple 8 bar theme, and turn it into a 4 bar theme. But it doesn’t just stop there.

You can just as easily expand it with the devices mentioned earlier, as well as a codetta, which is kind of like multiple cadences after each other, helping to dissipate the built up tension during the phrase. I’ll be talking about the codetta, and other framing functions, as well as interthematic functions in a few weeks, when we look at the first movement of the Symphony (no, I haven’t forgotten what this is all about).

Next, read about small binary form, and how it differs from the small ternary form.

Related posts:

  1. The Art of Modulation, Part 2: Common Chord Modulation Effective modulation is one of the skills that sets apart...
  2. What is a Phrase in Music? Categorizing music by form, is hierarchical in nature. At the...
  3. How to Compose Music, Part 4 – Start Composing Now! Start Composing Now It’s more than just a statement it’s...
  4. 30 Minute Composition #4 – B Minor 30 Minute Composition #4 – B Minor These are turning...
  5. The Process of Composing a Symphony Have you ever experienced that you wanted to express in...
  6. Musical Periods Unleashed! Musical Periods Like me, you have probably been frustrated composing...
  7. How Functional Harmony Works Have you ever found yourself stuck in a rut, creating...

Filed Under: Form, Theory Tagged With: A-B-A, antecedent phrase, archetypes, basic idea, binary form, binary theme, compound basic idea, consequent phrase, continuation phrase, contrasting middle, expansion, exposition, extension, interpolation, loose form, Musical Form, musical periods, musical sentence, recapitulation, small binary, small ternary, ternary form, ternary theme, tight-knit form

About Jon Brantingham

I am a film composer, and lover of music theory. I have spent many years figuring out the tools and techniques that actually work for composers, and now I want to teach them to you.

Want my best stuff on composing?

I've created a lot of resources on composing since 2011,

and I want to share them with you.

My best videos, podcasts, and articles, with goodies only available on the mailing list.

    We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time.

    We use affiliate links. If you purchase something using one of these links, we may receive compensation or commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Reader Interactions

    Comments

    1. Chad

      May 5, 2017 at 7:51 am

      Hi Jon,

      This material is incredibly well constructed. However, I would point out that in most musical circles this would not be considered an example of a ternary form. A true ternary form would include a full recapitulation of the two phrase period that forms the “A” section. This example uses only a single phrase to recapitulate the opening theme and is what most music theory teachers (like myself) would consider “Rounded Binary” (A B 1/2A)

      I do love the presentation of the materials and otherwise your descriptions are spot on.

      Reply
      • Jon Brantingham

        May 8, 2017 at 10:08 am

        Chad,

        Thanks for the comment. I get my definition from William Caplin’s book. The critical feature for him is that small binary doesn’t recapitulate the basic idea in tonic whereas small ternary does. Rounded binary in his theory is a subset of small ternary in which the exposition is repeated, and then the contrasting middle and recapitulation are repeated together.

        Reply
    2. melody lo

      March 8, 2016 at 6:11 pm

      Do you know what would have been better? if you could hear these melody, along with the score….

      Reply
      • Jon Brantingham

        March 9, 2016 at 11:44 am

        I did post the audio files. You should be able to play them.

        Reply
    3. john

      July 8, 2015 at 9:50 pm

      WOW! I love the way you explain these concepts in the most clear, concise, understandable way possible. This website truly democratizes music, taking it out of the ivory tower for all to enjoy. I love the way you avoid using the arrogant prose which so many “intellectuals” and “educators” are apt to use. They seem to delight in deliberately making incomprehensible subjects even harder to understand, while you achieve the exact opposite. This is a site for the everyman. The common person. I respect that a lot.

      Reply
      • Jon Brantingham

        July 9, 2015 at 9:15 am

        Thanks.

        Reply
    4. childe

      July 6, 2013 at 10:01 am

      sooooo useful

      Reply
    5. Tarynn M. Witten

      January 18, 2012 at 10:47 am

      Jon
      I have been studying music theory off and on for four years now and have never seen such clarity and exposition as your presentations. What was once difficult for me to understand has become far more comprehensible thanks to your style and efforts. You have gained a sincere follower and supporter of the generous time that you spend making this knowledge available in such a clear way; and for free no less. I will definitely add your link to my website as one of my favorites. Please keep up the great work. Yay you!

      Tarynn M. Witten, PhD, LCSW, FGSA (and beginning composer)

      Reply
      • Jon

        January 18, 2012 at 12:48 pm

        Thank you Tarynn for the kind words. I wish I could say that I came up with this stuff, but I am just standing on the shoulders of giants. Unfortunately most people don’t get a chance to read any of the really great music theory books out there, because there are a lot, and they are eye opening. The book that really changed my perspective on form is Classical Form by William Caplin. My goal is always to write something that answers the questions in a way that I wish they could have been answered for me when I was just starting to learn. I also want to open people up to the possibilites that music theory can bring for their compositions. Too many people think theory stunts creativity, but it is far from the truth. I’d love to hear some of your compositions. If you have any online, post a link.

        Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Footer CTA

    • Home
    • About
    • Contact
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
    • FAQs
    • Login
    • Merch
    • Courses

    Copyright © 2025 · Art of Composing